By Will Keys

The Dunning–Kruger effect is not stupidity; it is unrecognised overreach. It afflicts the competent who stray beyond their true mastery and mistake confidence for comprehension. Classical history offers a warning in Alcibiades—brilliant, persuasive, and fatally disloyal once ambition outran judgement.

That caution applies today to Douglas MacGregor. On military theory and practice, Colonel MacGregor is formidable. His assessments of Ukraine, grounded in force ratios and logistics, have largely been sound. The trouble begins when he leaves the parade ground for geopolitics. There, he is over his skis—confident where he is not competent—particularly on the nature and reach of Deep State influence and the balance of global power. In that realm, he misreads Donald J. Trump—a man of greater political weight and strategic instinct than MacGregor allows. The error is not malice; it is the Dunning–Kruger trap itself. Like Alcibiades, the slide is from brilliance to blindness once loyalty to discipline gives way to personal certainty.

Measured against that same yardstick, Vladimir Putin presents the counterexample. He has finessed Russia away from a direct World War III confrontation while remaining steadfast to a hard strategic truth: NATO’s eastward adventurism constituted an existential threat that Russia was bound to face down. Russia’s economy—growing at roughly one per cent—is hardly exhilarating, yet it is impressive under sanctions and war pressure. More importantly, Russia is likely to emerge from the Ukrainian morass more cohesive and strategically clearer than it entered.

By contrast, much of Europe’s political class appears trapped in the Dunning–Kruger/Alcibiades loop—high confidence, shallow strategy. The leadership echelons of the European Union, and of Germany, France, United Kingdom, and Italy, have spoken loudly while thinking narrowly—substituting moral posturing for power arithmetic, and mistaking alliance rhetoric for outcomes. That is not leadership; it is conceit dressed as virtue.

In that wider sense, Donald J. Trump deserves praise. Whatever his rough edges, his strategic instincts and transactional realism cut through illusions that bedevil others. The United States is badly divided, and by my assessment a full half of the population fails the test of responsible citizenship. Even so, clarity at the top still matters. In an age of overconfidence, humility before reality remains the rarest—and most necessary—form of brilliance.

Australia, regrettably, is not immune. It has been badly served by its national broadcaster, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, by its leading universities, and—most of all—by its political parties, which have too often preferred orthodoxy and slogan to reasoned national interest. The result is a shallow public discourse that rewards conformity and punishes dissent, a classic breeding ground for the Dunning–Kruger illusion.

In the wake of the Islamist slaughter at Bondi Beach, there may be an awakening of common sense, but one should not hold one’s breath. If roughly fifty per cent of American voters are uninformed or wilfully ignorant, much the same can be said of Australia. Democracies do not fail first from malice; they fail from complacency—and from the quiet confidence of people who do not know how much they do not know.

By Will Keys


Discover more from Africa Unauthorised

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

7 thoughts on “Over His Skis: When Expertise Becomes Conceit ”
  1. Always amazes how so many people have firm thoughts about mr Putin, i myself never having met the man base my opinion on what he says and what he does.
    trump has no strategy, he depends on other people to frame his policy, he is a mafia gangster intent on making colossal amounts of money and feeding his narcissism.
    Mr Putin is a statesman defending the existence of Russia, trump a greedy homicidal puppet strung along by neocon and zionist bankers.

    1. YOU Sir, have a MAJOR, Case of TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME and IF You are unable to see the Benficial (To Real American CITIZENS, that is), Changes and Benefits that President TRUMP has brought into play, in Comparison, to the BULL, that the USA had to suffer under 2 Bushies, Clinton, Obama and Biden, for too many years, then YOU need to urgently seek some form of Psychiatric HELP, and SOON..

    2. Hi Jay, I disagree with you about DJT. People believe what they want to believe.

  2. To contrast the TWO leading figures in this Battle of the Wills and Minds, you have to take into account, That Donald Trump is first and foremost a Constructor who had to battle the wiles and problems of developing real estate in downtown New York City and thus became a sharp minded Business man from this process.
    Putin was schooled at an early age by the scheming and plans of the KGB and took a major psychological Shock, when the Soviet Union went Belly Up. He has dreams of re-building an empire, that at this point in time seem to be a Fool’s Thoughts.
    What takes place in 2026, will cement for the next decade, how these unstable situations proceed or cease to exist.

    1. Hi Doug, I see the perspective you adopt. We agree on DJT but probably disagree about Putin. You are right that Putin was a Colonel in the KGB and he is obviously in favour of everything for Russia. On the other hand he is a Russian Orthodox Christian and a man of tremendous political restraint. His sense of restraint in handling the EU and USA is eye-opening and sharp. Shy of nuclear war, Russia will have its way in Ukraine. I predict a very good 2026 for Russia.

      1. YES WILL: By sheer force of numbers and industrial/technical output, Russia should hold sway over what the final outcome of this on-going battle is going to be finalized. The Western mind has great difficulty fathoming the long term thinking and goals of Both, Russia under Putin and China under Che and the current CCP control.
        MOST LIKELY NOT WHAT ANYONE IN THE WEST really WANTS TO SEE, TAKING PLACE..

Comments are closed.